Historically, there was a time in which confessions were regarded as the most cogent and satisfactory proof of guilt (regina probationum). This belief derived from the presumption that a person would not make an inaccurate statement against his own insterest.
A Mechanism for the Prevention of Torture: Article 135/A of CMUK
Historically, there was a time in which confessions were regarded as the most cogent and satisfactory proof of guilt (regina probationum). This belief derived from the presumption that a person would not make an inaccurate statement against his own insterest.
Thus, all confessions, no matter how obtained, were admitted as evidence without any distinction.
- Bıçak V. (1997-98) “A Mechanism for the Prevention of Torture: Article 135/A of CMUK”, 18-19 Turkish Yearbook of Human Rights, p. 54-71.
Loading...
[download id=”12810″]
Comments
No comments yet.